Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Poll Shows Newsom Leads Harris in 2028 Primary

    August 20, 2025

    Baby Socks Debate Divides Generations

    August 20, 2025

    BBC Postpones Ozzy Osbourne Documentary

    August 20, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Times TribuneTimes Tribune
    • Home
    • Business
    • World
    • Politics
    • Media & Culture
    • Life Style
    • About Us
    • Get In Touch
    Times TribuneTimes Tribune
    Home » Fat Brands Stock Craters Amid $47 Million Loan Scheme Allegations
    Business

    Fat Brands Stock Craters Amid $47 Million Loan Scheme Allegations

    Dylan HudsonBy Dylan HudsonMay 20, 2024Updated:July 11, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Federal authorities have charged Fat Brands and its chair, Andy Wiederhorn, with orchestrating a fraudulent scheme involving $47 million in sham loans. This news led to a significant drop in the company’s stock, which closed down 27% on Friday and left the company with a market value of $92 million.

    Federal Indictment and SEC Charges

    Fat Brands, Wiederhorn, and several others faced a criminal indictment by a federal grand jury in Los Angeles. The charges include wire fraud, tax evasion, and other counts related to the alleged fraudulent activities. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) also has filed a civil complaint against the company and Wiederhorn for violating the same scheme.

    “These charges are unprecedented, unwarranted, unsubstantiated, and unjust,” said Brian Hennigan, counsel for Fat Brands. “They are based on conduct that ended over three years ago and ignore the company’s cooperation with the investigation.”

    Wiederhorn’s Alleged Misconduct

    According to the indictment, Andy Wiederhorn, 58, as the chief executive of Fat Brands, directed the company to loan its funds to him without any intention of repayment. The SEC claims he used this money for personal expenses, including private jets, luxury vacations, and nearly $700,000 in shopping and jewelry.

    “We look forward to making clear in court that this is an unfortunate example of government overreach — and a case with no victims, no losses, and no crimes,” stated Wiederhorn’s attorney, Nicola Hanna.

    Impact on Fat Brands’ Financial Health

    Wiederhorn’s alleged fraud reportedly accounted for 44% of Fat Brands’ revenue between 2017 and 2021. This financial strain often left the company unable to pay its bills. Wiederhorn allegedly redirected funds from company-paid credit cards back to Fat Brands with help from his son, Thayer, the company’s chief operating officer.

    Failure to Disclose Previous Convictions

    The SEC complaint highlights that Fat Brands failed to disclose these cash transfers as related party transactions to investors. These transactions were later written off after the company’s merger with Fog Cutter Capital Group, also primarily owned by Wiederhorn.

    Additionally, Wiederhorn has a history of legal issues. In 2006, he owed the IRS significant amounts in unpaid taxes and had previously pleaded guilty to filing a false tax return and paying an illegal gratuity. During his time in federal prison, Fog Cutter Capital continued paying his salary and even provided a bonus equivalent to the fine he paid.

    Legal Proceedings and Future Outlook

    Wiederhorn will be arraigned Friday afternoon in the U.S. District Court in downtown Los Angeles. The arraignments for the other defendants, including Ron Roe, Rebecca Hershinger, and William Amon, are scheduled for the first week of June.

    Despite the gravity of the charges, Wiederhorn’s legal team remains confident. “We believe the court will recognize the lack of any victims, losses, or crimes in this case,” Hanna reiterated.

    The allegations against Fat Brands and Andy Wiederhorn have shocked the company and its shareholders. As the legal proceedings unfold, the impact on the company’s reputation and financial stability remains to be seen. Investors and stakeholders will closely monitor the case, awaiting further developments and potential repercussions for the involved parties.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Dylan Hudson
    • Website

    Related Posts

    MSNBC Rebrands as MS NOW After NBC Split

    August 18, 2025

    Air Canada faces strike threat, cancels flights

    August 14, 2025

    CoreWeave shares tumble on wider-than-expected loss

    August 13, 2025

    Comments are closed.

    Our Picks
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss

    Poll Shows Newsom Leads Harris in 2028 Primary

    Politics August 20, 2025

    A new POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll finds that California Democrats would prefer Governor Gavin Newsom…

    Baby Socks Debate Divides Generations

    August 20, 2025

    BBC Postpones Ozzy Osbourne Documentary

    August 20, 2025

    Spotify Adds Custom Playlist Transitions

    August 19, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    About Us
    About Us
    Our Picks
    More Links
    • About Us
    • Get In Touch
    • Fitness
    • Life Style
    • Travels
    • Technology
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    © 2025 Times Tribune | All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.